Back to Resources
Legal Advisory

§6695B and the New Attestation Liability

Why blind trust in supplier statements is no longer an adequate defense.

The biggest shift under Notice 2026-15 is Gate 2: Supplier Certifications. Proving your supply chain is clean now takes specific, legally binding attestations from every Tier 1 supplier in your Bill of Materials (BOM).

The Certification Checklist

To satisfy compliance, each supplier certification must include all of the following elements:

  • Supplier EINEmployer Identification Number, or analogous identification number issued by a foreign government (§7701(a)(52)(D)(iii)(IV)(aa))
  • Perjury StatementSigned under penalties of perjury by an authorized representative of the supplier (§7701(a)(52)(D)(iii)(IV)(bb))
  • Record RetentionRetained by both the supplier and the taxpayer for not less than six years, and provided to the IRS upon request (§7701(a)(52)(D)(iii)(IV)(cc))
  • PFE Attestation + Chain AttestationStates (1) the property was not produced or manufactured by a PFE, and (2) the supplier does not know, or have reason to know, that any prior supplier in the chain of production is a PFE (§7701(a)(52)(D)(iii)(IV)(dd)(AA))
  • Cost DataFor §45X: total direct material costs of components not produced by a PFE. For §45Y/§48E: total direct costs attributable to manufactured products not produced by a PFE (§7701(a)(52)(D)(iii)(IV)(dd)(BB)–(CC))

Introducing §6695B Penalty Liability

§6695B imposes a penalty on any supplier who provides a certification knowing, or having reason to know, it is inaccurate. The penalty equals the greater of 10% of the underpayment attributable to the inaccuracy or $5,000, whichever is greater. A reasonable cause defense is available, but only if the supplier can show the inaccuracy was not due to willful neglect. (§6695B(a)–(c))

Verdex treats every supplier upload as a claim to check, not a document to file. We test what a supplier certifies against what public data actually shows. If a supplier swears they're clean but the data says otherwise, that contradiction is exactly where your §6695B exposure lives.

Your defense against these penalties rests on a "reasonable cause" standard. To build a defensible §6695B reasonable-cause dossier, you have to show you didn't just accept a PDF at face value, but actually screened the supplier's corporate network.

Independent screening that produces a durable, timestamped record of every check, with the raw sources behind it, is the best protection you have.